Destruction of anchors of action Meaning: Analysis of Shushi turbulence in literary discourse (Case study of the literary discourse system in This dog wants to take Roxana)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 university teacher in Azad university, south branch

2 faculty member of Islamic Azad University, south branch

3 Faculty member of PNU

10.30465/copl.2021.36286.3528

Abstract

The body of the present study includes the study of semiotics and the analysis of the systems of action of the book "This dog wants to take Roxana" by Qassem Kashkoli. At first, the existing discourse systems will be examined and in the next stage, these discourse systems will be examined interdisciplinary to examine its main features, including action .Then, these characteristics are examined in the form of narrative processes specific to this author and it will be determined what is the place of action and cognition in relation to transcendental functions. So our main issue in this article is to see how the action anchors are destroyed one after the other, giving way to turbulent and indeterminate rays. In fact, the main purpose of this article is how delaying action, mechanization of time, rupture in the connection of action elements cause the destruction of semantic anchors and lead to semantic turbulence. In fact, each of the characteristics of action and eloquence and multiple dimensions of the study of discourse systems in the context of the sign-semantics approach of discourse in this work is somewhat evident. So the key is to see how the action anchors are destroyed one after the other, giving way to turbulent, indeterminate glass. Also, how action suspension, time mechanization, rupture in the connection of action elements, and sudden displacement of narrative elements cause the destruction of semantic anchors and semantic turbulence. Then based on what pattern the semantic-sign process is developed to lead to the production of volatile meanings.
In fact, the present article tries to answer these questions:
1- What factors cause the destruction of semantic anchors in the studied work?
2. What are the most important aspects of the representation of discourse in " this dog wants to take, Roxana" and how do these aspects lead us to a fluid and post-discourse

Keywords

References

 
منابع انگلیسی
Bertrand, D. 1985. L'espace et le sens: Germinal d'Emile Zola (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing.
Bertrand, D. 2000. Precis de la Semiotique litteraire, Paris: Nathan.
Chandler, D. 1994. Semiotics ,the basics. London: Routledge.
Fontanille, J., 1989, Les espaces subjectifsi Inroduction a la ‘semiotique L’observateur, Paris: Hachett.
Fontanille, J.,1998, semiotique du discours, Limoges, Limoges: Univ Presses
Fontanille, J. 1999. Sémiotique et Littérature. Essais de méthode.Paris, Paris: PUF.
Greimas, A. J. (1972). Sémantique structurale: recherche de méthode. Larousse.
Greimas, A. & Fontanille, J. 1991. Sémiotique des passions: des états de choses aux états d'âme. Seuil.
Greimas, A. J, 1990, Narrative Semiotics and Cognitive Discourses, Ttans. Paul Perron & Frank W.
Greimas,A. J, et Joseph Courtes, 1993, semiotique. Dictionnaire raisonne de la theorie du langage, Paris: Hachette.
Landowski, E. (1989). La société refléchié. Paris: Seuil.
Landowski, E. (2005). Les interactions risquées. Nouveaux Actes Sémiotiques, 101, 102, 103, Limoges: Pulim.
Hjelslev.L., 1997, essais linguistiques, Paris: Minuit.
Shairi, Hamid Reza et Somayeh kariminehad. (2014). Pour une sémiotique de l’alerte, les conditions sémiolittéraire de l’éveil de corps. Signata, volume 5. Université de Liège.
Zilberberg, Cl. (2006). Eléments de grammaire tensive. Nouveaux actes sémiotiques. Limoges: Pulim.
Zilberberg,CI. 2012, La structure tensive, Belgique, Press universitaires de liege

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics