How children are represented in adult narrative literature from the perspective of critical discourse analysis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Computational Linguistics, Regional Information center for Science and Technology

2 Department of Linguistics, Fars science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University

10.30465/copl.2021.6153

Abstract

From the perspective of critical discourse analysis, this study examined the ways children are represented in the adult narrative literature. The novels of “Su va shun”,Simin Daneshvar (1348), “Turn off the Lights”, Zoya Pirzad (2001) and “My Bird”, Fariba Vafi (2002), were selected as data for this study. The paradigm used as the concept of representation of social actors by Van Leuven (1996). In order to analyze the data, discursive structures and interpretations were separated and counted as non- discursive structures. Then the frequency and percentage of discursive components and the amount of discord were determined. The results showed that the children were actively, dynamically and explicitly represented. They have become more individualized in these texts, and among the individual components a part of the naming component has been used more to represent them, reflecting the personal and individual identity of the children. Also, children were not subjected to gender discrimination in these works, and there was no significant difference between boys and girls.

Keywords


Crystal, D. (1992). An encyclopedic Dictionary of Language and Languages. U.S.A: Blackwell Publishing.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change, London: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N., Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies: A Mulidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 2, London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power, London: Longman.
Fowler, R. (1992). Power and Language, International encyclopedia of linguistics. Vol.3. London; Oxford university press.
Hobson, H. (2003). A Discourse of Representation of Masculinity and Feminity in Baden-Powel’s 1919. Handbook for Scouts and Guides using the framework of theory Van Leeuwen, with the tradition of Critical Discourse Analysis.
Ogola, J. (2007). Masculinities in Kiswahili Children’s literature in Keneya, Sawahili Froum, Vol.14, 245-254.
Rogers, R., Christian, J. (2007). What Could I Say? A Critical discourse analysis of the construction of race in children’s literature, Race Ethnicity and Education Journal, Vol.10, No.1, 21-46.
Talif, R., Nair, R. (2010). Lexical Choices and the Construction of Gender in Malaysian Literature, Kajian Malaysia, Vol.28, No.2.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Handbook of Discourse Analysis in Society, London, Routledge.
Van Leeuwen, T. A. (1996). The Representing of Social Actors, in Coldas- coulthard, C. R. & Coulthard, M. (eds.), Text and Practices, Reading in CDA, London, Routledge.
Wharton, S. (2005). Invisible Females, incapable Males: Gender Construction in Children’s Reading Scheme, Language and Education, Vol.19, 235-238.
Wodak, R. (2001). Critical discourse analysis in postmodern societies in: Folia Longuistica, Vol. 35. 1-2, Berlin.